Nana B
The National Organiser of the governing New Patriotic Party(NPP) Henry Nana Boakye also known as Nana B has described the approach of the Ghana Revenue in taxing traders in parts of the country as ” lame and oppressive”.
His comment comes after more traders within the Central Business District of Kumasi shut down their shops on Tuesday in protest against tax increases imposed on them by the government.
The traders are also kicking against plans by the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) to deploy their officers at each shop to record Value Added Tax (VAT) on items on sale.
In a Facebook ON Tuesday(11 October) Nana B described the approach by the GRA as oppressive, repressive and suppressive.
Below is the full post:
I have been following the activities of Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) in recent times in their efforts to maximize revenue mobilization and I want to point out one major challenging revenue mobilization strategy employed by the authority in some parts of the country including Kumasi.
GRA has stationed its officers at shops, restaurants and other businesses to record sales of products for tax purposes. Reports say traders in Adum, Kumasi have closed their shops in protest against this obnoxious move by GRA.
This strategy would have been justified only if it was targeted at businesses that ample evidence shows have been evading or under-declaring their taxes.
But in my candid opinion, this ‘wide-spread approach’ of stationing revenue officers at business is counterproductive, oppressive, repressive and suppressive.
We are not in normal times – businesses and individuals are bearing the brunt of the twin global crisis and their concomitant economic agony – and the least expected from GRA is to police traders whom no tax evasion findings have been made against.
In this day of technology, GRA should adopt welcoming and pleasant ways of revenue collections strategy that engenders revenue assurance. This strategy is weak and lame since Revenue Officers stationed at these shops and businesses can be compromised to aid owners to evade or under-declare their taxes. GRA should rather strive to reduce human contact in revenue collection and employ technological solutions to take taxes from businesses.
Lastly, the communication department or Public Relations unit of GRA appears dead. Paying taxes is not a pleasant thing and for that matter, responsive PR approach must be adopted to educate the tax paying population of their programmes and activities.
